The Prophet Daniel and

the Sealed Vision for "Distant Times"

The Prophet Daniel received an extraordinary vision, but it was not intended for immediate understanding.

In Daniel 8, he describes a vision so complex and profound that he states, "I was astonished by the vision, but no one understood it." This expression highlights the mysterious and inaccessible nature of the divine revelation at that time. No one in Daniel's era had the capacity to fully comprehend the significance of this prophecy, a point also emphasized by the angel who spoke to him.

His vision refers to a power symbolized by the "little horn." This horn grows and gains influence, becoming a major force impacting the "Holy Place" and the course of human history. The angel tells Daniel that the vision does not pertain solely to his contemporary context but rather to "the time of the end," clarifying that the events described would take place much later in time. This vision was tied to the conclusion of a long period, and its meaning was to be fully revealed only in those distant times.

A crucial aspect of the vision is the clear instruction Daniel receives: "But you, seal up the vision, for it concerns distant times." This act of sealing emphasizes that the correct interpretation of this prophecy would not be accessible to past generations but was destined to be revealed only at the proper time, when "the time of the end" was near. Thus, the prophecy remained sealed for thousands of years, protected from premature or incorrect interpretations.

Another significant element of the vision is the period of "two thousand three hundred evenings and mornings," which is said to pass before "the Holy Place will be cleansed." This is not an ordinary period of literal days, but rather a prophetic calculation where one day symbolizes a year. Thus, the period of 2,300 years becomes a crucial benchmark for identifying when the interpretation of the vision will become clear and understood.

"The vision of the evenings and mornings that has been spoken of is true"—this is a reaffirmation of the prophecy’s truth and its importance for "distant times." This phrase underscores once again that Daniel's vision is not merely a vague or symbolic message but a reality that will be fulfilled exactly as prophesied. Therefore, Daniel is again instructed to seal the vision, as it is intended to be deciphered and understood only when the specified time has been fulfilled.

In conclusion, the correct interpretation of this vision could not have been known in Daniel's time or in the centuries that immediately followed. This knowledge is reserved for the time of the end, and the angel makes it clear that only in those times "the vision will be understood." It is essential to understand that the sealing of the vision had a precise purpose: to prevent premature understanding and to ensure that its truth would be revealed only at the proper time, upon the fulfillment of the 2,300 years.

Misinterpretations of the Prophecy:

Antiochus Epiphanes and the Misunderstanding of the Times

Over the centuries, some biblical commentators have associated the "little horn" in Daniel's vision with the historical figure of Antiochus Epiphanes. He was a Hellenistic ruler from the 2nd century BCE, known for defiling the Temple in Jerusalem and for his persecutions against the Jews. In this light, many saw in Antiochus the fulfillment of the prophecy about the "little horn."

However, this interpretation is not correct. The prophecy in Daniel clearly refers to "the time of the end" (Daniel 8:17), and Antiochus Epiphanes lived long before that time. The vision does not pertain to a local event in Jewish history but to "distant times" that had not yet been fulfilled during Antiochus' era. If the correct interpretation had been tied to him, it would not have made sense for the vision to be sealed and reserved for the future. The prophecy speaks of events that will take place only at the time of the end, and thus Antiochus cannot be the central figure of this vision.

Daniel is warned that the vision will not be understood before its time, and this underscores the necessity of sealing it: "But you, seal up the vision, for it concerns distant times" (Daniel 8:26). Therefore, interpretations that arose before the fulfillment of the 2,300 evenings and mornings are erroneous, as the time for the unsealing of the vision had not yet come. This is the essence of the misunderstanding that has persisted over the centuries, including the incorrect interpretation that links Antiochus to the "little horn."

Clarifications from Jesus about "the time of the end"

Even during the time of Jesus, "the time of the end" was still far away. In Matthew 24, the disciples asked Him about the signs of the coming end and the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies: "And what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?" This question reflected their concern about when all these prophecies would be fulfilled.

At that time, around 30 CE, the Temple in Jerusalem still existed. Although the disciples might have associated the "Holy Place" in Daniel's prophecy with the physical Temple, Jesus explained to them that the prophecies did not refer directly to that Temple. The true significance of the "Holy Place" in Daniel’s vision is much deeper. It is not merely about a physical location or a specific building in Jerusalem but refers to the entire authentic worship and divine revelation that God had offered to His people.

Jesus lived about 200 years after Antiochus Epiphanes, yet the events described in Daniel's vision were still far from being fully realized. Antiochus was only a small part of the long chain of events that were to follow. Despite the events that took place during the time of Antiochus, the activity of the "little horn" was far from over. As the prophecy clearly indicated, this was to unfold over a much longer period, and Jesus' disciples understood that "the time of the end" was not yet near.

Therefore, the prophetic activity associated with the "little horn" did not end in the time of Jesus, nor immediately afterward. The prophesied events span a long period, and the "time of the end" indicated by Daniel remains a key reference point for the complete fulfillment of the vision.

A new and unprecedented interpretation of the prophecy in 2024

In 2024, a new interpretation of Daniel’s prophecy concerning the "little horn" has emerged. This interpretation is not based on speculation but is the result of rigorous analysis, grounded in theological, historical, and philosophical evidence that anyone can verify. Unlike the traditional interpretations that have circulated over the centuries, this new decoding of the prophecy offers a completely different and much more precise understanding.

This interpretation asserts that the time for understanding Daniel's vision has come now, in "the time of the end." It is crucial for those interested in the correct understanding of the prophecy to heed this discovery and to "read and understand," as Jesus Himself urged. "Whoever has ears, let them hear," and those who seek to understand the truth must pay attention to this new interpretation. This message is vital for our time, as the key to understanding the prophecy has finally been deciphered, and those who seek the truth must take note of this revelation.

The Historical Context of 280 B.C.: the period of the FOUR HELLENISTIC KINGDOMS

To correctly understand the appearance of the "little horn," we must first establish the historical context in which this horn could appear. After the death of Alexander the Great, his empire was divided among four generals. These generals took power in different regions of the former empire. The last of these generals died in 280 B.C.

According to historical evidence, the period of the FOUR HELLENISTIC KINGDOMS, which followed the death of Alexander the Great, also ended around 280 B.C., when the Lysimachid Kingdom disappeared completely.

Let's review what happened to them:

• The Ptolemaic Kingdom (Egypt): survived until 30 B.C., when it was conquered by Rome.
• The Seleucid Kingdom (Syria and Babylon): survived until 63 B.C., when it was conquered by Rome.
• The Macedonian Kingdom (Antigonid): survived until 168 B.C., when it was conquered by Rome at the Battle of Pydna.
• The Lysimachid Kingdom (Thrace and Asia Minor): disappeared in 281 B.C.

The historical issue:

So, after 280 B.C., we can no longer speak of FOUR KINGDOMS, but only of three. However, the prophecy speaks of four horns and four kingdoms. Therefore, THIS IS THE MOMENT when the "little horn" indicated by prophecy must begin its domination.

In conclusion, we can say that regardless of how we define the end of their rule, whether referring to the four generals of Alexander or to the four kingdoms, we still arrive at the year 280 B.C., which was the year when the "way" was opened for the affirmation of the "little horn," and the 2300-year period began to unfold. The prophecy clearly mentions that at the end of this period, the "Sanctuary" will be cleansed.

The new power that fulfilled Daniel's prophecy

What power arose from Ancient Greece in 280 B.C. that fulfilled all the prophetic details? The answer is clear and precise: Philosophy. It was born in Ancient Greece and began to spread rapidly after this date, profoundly influencing all aspects of life, from politics to religion and culture. Unlike the military powers that previously dominated, Philosophy conquered the world through thought and ideology, rejecting any form of divine revelation and replacing traditional beliefs with rational explanations, based on human reason.

Philosophy did not take control through military force but through intellectual and cultural influence. This is the power that rose after 280 BCE and corresponded exactly to the description of the "little horn" in Daniel’s prophecy. It began to reject any form of divine revelation and replaced it with reason and human intellect as the only sources of truth.

This new interpretation provides a clear answer to the question of what power rose after 280 BCE. Philosophy took control and continued to expand its influence, becoming a dominant force in the world. This "little horn" began modestly but over time expanded and gained enormous power, influencing how humanity thinks and relates to the world around it.

Philosophy: An Ideology That Rejected Any Form of Divine Revelation

After 280 BCE, Philosophy emerged as a new power in the world, not only through its influence on politics and culture but also through its active rejection of divine revelation. Philosophy began to challenge traditional religious ideas and offer explanations based on human reason and logic. Specifically, this ideology viewed all religious writings in the world, without exception, as products of human imagination and illusion. This meant that, for philosophers, no divine revelation, regardless of the religion it came from, had absolute validity. These were seen only as mental constructions, with no real foundation in divine intervention.

Philosophy deeply challenged the idea that humans could receive direct revelations from God, and this thinking dominated the intellectual space of the time, causing major shifts in how humanity understood its relationship with the divine. Instead of accepting revelations transmitted through prophets or scriptures, Philosophy placed human reason first, asserting that mankind, through the power of its own thought, could decipher the mysteries of the universe without the help of any divine entity.

Antiochus Epiphanes and Philosophy: The Historical Connection

Antiochus Epiphanes, one of the historical figures frequently associated with Daniel’s prophecy, was deeply influenced by this philosophical ideology. Although some viewed him as a tyrannical leader who acted out of pure cruelty, his actions were motivated by deeply philosophical ideas. Antiochus was directly influenced by the concepts of Hellenistic philosophy, a philosophy that rejected traditional divine revelations and promoted a world based on human reason and culture.

A concrete example of how Antiochus acted under this philosophical influence is the decree he issued around 167 BCE, known as The Decree of Antiochus IV Epiphanes on the Cessation of Traditional Education in Favor of Greek Philosophy. This decree banned traditional religious education and imposed Greek philosophy as the standard educational system in the empire. Antiochus was determined to fundamentally change how people related to religion and to impose philosophical ideology, thus promoting an intellectual approach that rejected the idea of divine intervention in the world. In his view, philosophical education was the key to progress and civilization, and religious revelations had to be eliminated.

Philosophy and Its Impact on the World: The 2,300 Years of Influence

Antiochus Epiphanes’ decree, while significant, was just a small part of what philosophy accomplished over the course of 2,300 years. The prophecy in Daniel specifies that the period of influence of the "little horn" would last for 2,300 "evenings and mornings," or 2,300 years. This long period extends far beyond Antiochus or Ancient Greece, covering a much larger span of human history from 280 BCE to the present.

During this period, philosophy profoundly influenced human thought, causing major changes in areas such as education, religion, and governance. Over these 2,300 years, philosophers continued to challenge divine revelations and promote a world in which man, not God, was at the center of the universe. From Ancient Greece to the modern era, philosophy has had a major impact on how people understand their existence and their place in the world.

This philosophical influence, which gradually grew over time, has led to what we see today—a world dominated by rational and secular ideas, where religious beliefs are often met with skepticism or outright rejection.

Philosophy Embedded in Jewish Religion: The Pharisees and Sadducees

Although Antiochus Epiphanes’ attack on Jewish religion culminated in the desecration of the Temple and the offering of unclean sacrifices, and the "Sanctuary was cleansed" physically from these acts of profanation, his ideological impact was far deeper. In reality, Antiochus succeeded in bringing Hellenistic philosophy into the heart of Jewish religion, an influence that would fully manifest during the time of Jesus.

Even though the Maccabean revolt succeeded in liberating the Temple and resuming traditional religious practices, Greek philosophy remained rooted in the mentality of the religious leaders of the time. During the time of Jesus, two major groups emerged—the Pharisees and Sadducees—whose theology was deeply influenced by Greek philosophical currents. These groups were no longer centered on authentic revelation from the Scriptures but had shaped their religious beliefs according to Hellenistic philosophical ideas.

The Pharisees and the Influence of Stoic Philosophy

The Pharisees were known for their insistence on strict adherence to the Law and oral traditions. However, what is often not recognized is the influence of Stoic philosophy on Pharisaic theology. Stoicism, a philosophical school that promoted control over emotions and acceptance of a universal moral law, had a major impact on the Pharisees. They adopted from Stoicism the idea that the Law, in its purely external form, was sufficient to define a person as moral and righteous.

The Pharisees focused on an extremely legalistic form of religion, where adherence to rules and traditions imposed by them became the ultimate measure of righteousness. Although they outwardly based their teachings on the Scriptures, their interpretations were often influenced by Stoic concepts, which emphasized self-discipline and rigorous conformity to rules, without placing equal emphasis on a deep spiritual relationship with God. Thus, their religion transformed into a mechanical application of the law, rather than a practice of living faith based on authentic revelation.

The Sadducees and the Influence of Epicurean Philosophy

On the other hand, the Sadducees were influenced by Epicurean philosophy, which was skeptical of the supernatural and promoted a life focused on moderate pleasures and reason. Epicureans argued that the material world was all that existed and that any form of life after death was an illusion. Similarly, the Sadducees rejected fundamental ideas of Jewish faith, such as the resurrection of the dead, the existence of angels, and spirits, being far more oriented toward reason and skepticism.

This Epicurean influence led the Sadducees to adopt a secularized form of religion, where the focus was on the present and the tangible, ignoring or minimizing the supernatural and eschatological dimensions of divine revelation. Unlike the Pharisees, who emphasized adherence to the law, the Sadducees preferred to see religion as a set of rational rules governing social order, without involving the supernatural. They rejected anything that could not be explained through the lens of reason and did not align with the messianic or spiritual expectations of the people.

Thus, the influence of Hellenistic philosophy, initially brought by Antiochus Epiphanes, deeply infiltrated the Jewish religion of the time. Both the Pharisees and Sadducees built their theologies not on authentic divine revelation from the Scriptures but on ideas inspired by philosophies that rejected the supernatural or imposed a rigid view of the law. Jesus’ confrontations with these groups reflect not only a struggle to restore true faith but also a response to the infiltration of philosophy into the theology of the time.

Philosophy and the Charge of Blasphemy Against Jesus

One of the clearest pieces of evidence of the influence of Greek philosophy on Jewish theology during the time of Jesus is the charge of blasphemy brought against Him for declaring Himself the "Son of God." According to the philosophical idea of essences, inspired by Aristotelian thought, a human could not possess a divine essence. This was the foundation of the blasphemy accusations, as the Jews, influenced by these philosophical conceptions, believed that Jesus, being human, could not claim a divine status. In the Aristotelian philosophical framework, the divine and the human were entirely separate, and Jesus' claims were seen as a violation of this view.

However, the revelation of Scripture was not based on this rigid separation but on the concept of divine anointing. Jesus did not claim to have a "divine essence" in the philosophical sense, but that He was the Anointed One, the Messiah, fulfilling the will of the Father based on the Covenant. He acted and spoke in the name of God, having the divine mandate to carry out the mission for which He was sent. Jesus counters the accusations of blasphemy by using Scripture itself: "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are gods'? If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came—and Scripture cannot be set aside—what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, ‘I am God’s Son’?" (John 10:34-36). Thus, Jesus explains that He does not claim a divine essence but acts in accordance with the Scriptures, which legitimize His identity as "the Son of God" through anointing and sanctification, in alignment with the Father’s will, not through philosophy or theories about essences.

The Difference Between Common Sense and the Philosophical Concept of REASON

Rationality is a divine gift given to every person by God. It represents the ability to discern between right and wrong, make moral decisions, and live according to the divine will. The average person, even without special education, possesses this innate rationality, which allows them to understand the essential matters of life. It is sufficient for one to live morally and correctly, based on God's revelation and their own conscience. The rationality given by God is clear and accessible, being part of the divine order of creation.

In contrast, what philosophers call REASON does not refer to this natural and accessible capacity for all, but rather to a complicated system of thought built on their own theories and speculations. Philosophers claim an exclusive right to define truth, good, and evil, relying on their own theories and dogmas while ignoring divine revelation. This philosophical REASON is viewed as a superior intellectual process, accessible only to those initiated in abstract thinking, implying that ordinary people are incapable of reaching the same level of knowledge.

Philosophers assert that only through this special REASON can they arrive at universal truths and understand reality, thus placing their thinking above the simple rationality given by God to all people. They not only claim superiority over ordinary people but also attempt to redefine truth and morality, complicating and distorting what is clear and simple in divine revelation. Instead of accepting that every person, through the rationality given by God, can live a moral and righteous life, they complicate this relationship with the divine by introducing speculations that distance people from the truth.

Thus, the REASON of philosophers does not add value to truth or morality but creates a distance between people and the clear revelation of God. While the average person uses their rationality to understand what is right and wrong, philosophers create a complex system that aims to dominate thinking, rejecting the simple and accessible revelation of the Creator. This distinction is essential to understanding how philosophy has placed itself above divine revelation through an exclusive form of reason that claims to hold the truth, but in reality, complicates and distorts what is already clearly established by God.

The Infiltration of Philosophy into Christian Religion

After philosophy had a major impact on Jewish religion, the same influence began to penetrate Christianity in the early centuries following the death of Jesus. As Christianity spread through the Greco-Roman world, many philosophical concepts were integrated into the doctrines and teachings of the church, leading to the establishment of dogmas based on philosophy rather than pure divine revelation. These philosophical influences crystallized into certain teachings that persist in most Christian churches to this day.

A central example of this philosophical infiltration is the doctrine of the Trinity, which is not based on clear revelation from Scripture but on philosophical concepts about the essence of God, developed in the 4th century. Rather than relying on the biblical teaching about God as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, the church adopted the philosophical idea of the essential unity of the three "divine persons." This doctrine was developed using Greek concepts of substance and being, especially the influences of Plato and Aristotle, philosophers who influenced early theologians in formulating this dogma.

Another example is the doctrine of the dual nature of Jesus, which asserts that Jesus is both fully divine and fully human. While this concept may seem compatible with Scripture, it was formulated and defined using Greek philosophical terms about nature and essence. Thus, the idea was introduced into theology that Jesus possesses two distinct natures in one person, a teaching rooted more in Greek metaphysics than in the clear biblical revelation.

Additionally, the doctrine of original sin is another example of philosophical influence. It was elaborated by Augustine, a theologian heavily influenced by Neoplatonic philosophy, who viewed human nature as inherently corrupt due to a hereditary sin passed down from Adam and Eve. The idea of an inherited "sinful nature" is more aligned with philosophical concepts of essence and degeneration than with the direct teaching of Scripture about each individual's personal responsibility before God.

Furthermore, the concept of the immortality of the soul, widely accepted in many Christian churches, does not originate from divine revelation in the Old or New Testament but comes from Platonic philosophy, which views the soul as immortal and separate from the body. In Scripture, however, the teaching on death and resurrection emphasizes death as a state of sleep and the resurrection of the body at the end of times, not the intrinsic immortality of the soul. This philosophical concept drastically changed Christians' perception of death and the afterlife.

The Consequences of Integrating Philosophy into Christian Dogmas

These examples show how Philosophy has penetrated the fundamental dogmas of Christianity, altering the original message of Scripture. Instead of Christian dogmas being based solely on biblical revelation, they were shaped through the lens of Greek philosophy concerning essence, nature, and metaphysics. These doctrines, rather than being purely biblical, are a combination of inspired teachings and philosophical concepts that have distorted the original understanding of the Christian faith.

Thus, philosophy has succeeded in influencing and shaping Christianity in a significant way, leaving a profound mark on the theology of the church, which persists to this day. This integration of philosophy has led to a reinterpretation of divine revelation and the formation of dogmas tainted by philosophical speculations.

Philosophy: A Constant Attack on Divine Revelation

Over the course of 2,300 years, philosophy has represented a continuous and systematic attack on divine revelation. Philosophers have either tried to completely destroy sacred revelations or to "reinterpret" them in light of their own rational and human dogmas. This attack was not brutal and direct but rather subtle and systematic, acting through criticism of religion, challenging the supernatural, and attempting to reduce religious beliefs to mere superstitions or myths.

This strategy of reinterpreting divine revelations was extremely dangerous because it used reason as the main tool to challenge the validity of scriptures and prophecies. Philosophers promoted the idea that all religions and sacred texts are products of human imagination and psyche, not authentic divine intervention. By rationalizing and reducing religion to mere human experience, they undermined religious beliefs from within, creating confusion and doubt.

Philosophy did not limit itself to the physical destruction of religious texts or monuments but attacked the very foundation of faith. Through its various branches, whether we speak of skepticism, materialism, or extreme rationalism, philosophy has always sought to offer alternatives to religious answers, proposing that man can understand the universe and life without the help of any divine revelation.

The Submission of Religions to Philosophy

Throughout history, Philosophy has not only attacked divine revelation but also subjected many religions to its own dogmas and conceptions, transforming and adapting them to the dominant philosophical principles. Over time, many religions were forced, through legal or social constraints, to align with the secularized and rationalized vision that philosophy imposed. Religions that once relied on divine revelation came to adjust their dogmas to be in harmony with humanistic, rational, and secular philosophy.

In many cases, religions were so influenced by philosophy that they imposed upon themselves dogmas compatible with philosophical ideas. Through a gradual process of adaptation, religious beliefs were reinterpreted to conform to the new philosophical order. Thus, the doctrine of divine revelation, which should be immutable, was often modified to fit the rational and humanistic vision imposed by dominant philosophy.

Moreover, in many cases, religion was not only voluntarily adapted to the dominant philosophy but was forced to do so by the force of civil and social laws. Especially in modern societies, many religions have been compelled to submit to philosophy through legal constraints, whether related to education, morality, or other sensitive areas. Philosophy thus imposed its rules and norms, transforming religions into structures that had to conform to the secular and rational values of modern society.

Therefore, Philosophy has not only challenged divine revelation but has extended its influence over religions worldwide, shaping them according to its own rational and secular dogmas. It has subtly undermined the authenticity and authority of divine revelation, replacing it with a system of thought based on human reason and understanding, without recourse to the supernatural.

Philosophy: The Master of the Modern World

Philosophy, which began to expand and impose its ideas after 280 BCE, has now become the master of the world. Over the course of the 2,300 prophetic years, philosophy has surpassed the borders of Ancient Greece and extended throughout the Roman Empire and beyond, profoundly influencing the thinking and social structures of the modern world. Today, most of the world's nations are founded on philosophical principles, governed by rational and secular values that reflect the philosophical ideology of rejecting divine revelation.

Over time, philosophy has established itself as the supreme authority over all aspects of human life. From government to education, from science to culture, philosophy has shaped the structures and values of society. Modern states lack an authentic religious foundation and rely exclusively on rational and humanistic conceptions. As a result, religion has been marginalized and regarded as a personal or cultural matter, while philosophy has become the new "law" governing political and social decisions.

This dominance of philosophy is not merely cultural or academic but a real dominance that profoundly influences all nations of the modern world. Global politics and governance are structured in such a way that philosophical principles are legally and systematically implemented, while divine revelations and religious practices are increasingly pushed into the background, subordinated to the laws and philosophical values.

Philosophy and Its Limits: The Imminent Intervention of God

Philosophy has extended its power and influence over the world for 2,300 years, but this domination has been allowed by God only up to a certain point. After this prophetic period has passed, without any human hand, God will directly intervene to put an end to this philosophical madness and blasphemy that have ruled the world.

Daniel's prophecy clearly indicates that Philosophy will dominate the world only for a limited period, and after the 2,300 years are over, God will act without human help to restore divine order. Philosophy, which has elevated human reason above divine revelation, will be abruptly stopped without the power of any human hand. This is an exclusive action of God, who does not need human support or intervention to end the domination of philosophy and to cleanse the "Holy Place."

This divine intervention is inevitable and will mark the end of Philosophy’s period of influence, which has shaped the world’s thinking and structures for 2,300 years. Although philosophy has expanded greatly and has become an apparently invincible global force, God’s plan is clear: this domination will have an end, and the restoration of divine order will take place without the help of any human hand. It is a direct and exclusive action of the Creator, who will put an end to this era of rationalism and rejection of revelation.

Thus, despite its enormous power and influence, Philosophy will not be able to stop God's intervention, which will restore divine order in the world. Philosophy, which has been allowed to dominate only for a limited time, will come to an end, and divine revelation will triumph through the direct intervention of the Creator.

The Prophets and the Announcement of Divine Intervention

The imminent intervention of God, which will put an end to Philosophy’s domination, has been clearly announced by Jesus and all the prophets of both the Old and New Testaments. This divine action is not an isolated or unexpected event but has been foretold long ago as part of the divine plan for restoring order in the world. In Matthew 24, Jesus warns about the signs of the end and the difficult times that will come before God directly intervenes in human history.

The prophets of the Old Testament spoke of a time when God would put an end to human works that contradict divine revelation, and the prophets of the New Testament continued to warn about this intervention. The domination of philosophy, this intellectual heresy that rejected divine revelation, will be replaced by the order established by the Creator. This will mark the end of the era in which man, through reason and knowledge, tried to elevate himself above God.

Jesus, through His words and warnings to His disciples, was very clear: "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away" (Matthew 24:35). This message confirms that divine prophecies are certain and inevitable. God's intervention cannot be stopped by anyone and will come at the appointed time, as all the prophets have foretold.

Divine Intervention: A Reality Embodied in All Major Religious Revelations

The intervention of the Creator is not only a central theme in the Bible but is also presented in many other religious revelations around the world. All major religions have teachings that speak of a time when God will directly intervene to restore order and correct human deviations. This demonstrates a universal truth that transcends cultural and religious boundaries.

In religious traditions from India, China, Persia, and other regions of the world, there are prophecies and teachings that indicate that divine order will be restored. These prophecies and writings reflect the universal expectation of a divine intervention that will correct injustices and bring an end to the domination of philosophy, materialism, and secularism.

These various revelations, though different in expression and context, convey the same fundamental message: God will not allow human error, manifested through ideologies that reject the divine, to continue indefinitely. The revelations present in all the major religions of the world point to the same culminating point: a divine intervention that will transform the world and bring about the restoration of divine order.

Philosophy: The "Little Horn" That Became Gigantic

Daniel's prophecy about the "little horn" that "became exceedingly great" has been fully realized in the philosophy that began to exert its influence after 280 BCE. Philosophy, which was initially a relatively small intellectual movement, has continually expanded, taking over all areas of human life—from politics to religion and education. Over time, this ideology has transformed into a gigantic force that has taken control of the entire world.

Today, philosophy rules the world, influencing every aspect of daily life and social and political decisions. It is a subtle yet extremely dangerous power that has succeeded in imposing its dogmas everywhere. Philosophy is no longer a mere intellectual curiosity or a way of looking at the world; it has become the force that governs entire nations. Religious teachings are either subjected to this philosophy or reinterpreted to align with its rational and secular principles.

Philosophy has penetrated all institutions of the modern world and has shaped conceptions of reality, morality, and existence. It has transformed the way people relate to God, emphasizing reason, knowledge, and purely natural explanations at the expense of faith and divine revelation. The "little horn" has grown "gigantic" and rules the entire world, just as Daniel prophesied thousands of years ago.

A New Interpretation of the Prophecy: The Sign of the End Times

The new interpretation of Daniel’s prophecy, which identifies philosophy as the "little horn," has been completely unknown to the world until now. This new understanding has only emerged now, at the "time of the end," the prophetic moment when Daniel's vision was meant to be deciphered and understood correctly. This is a clear sign that the appropriate time has come to grasp the message of the prophecy. For 2,300 years, this vision was sealed and inaccessible to past generations, but now it has been unsealed, and this is the key that allows us to see and understand the truth.

Daniel’s prophecy has always been a challenge for theologians and scholars, but only now, at the end of the 2,300-year period, has the correct interpretation come to light. The fact that a new interpretation has emerged precisely at the time destined for this revelation is a powerful sign that the "time of the end" is near. This interpretation must be taken seriously and carefully analyzed by anyone who still believes in God’s Revelation.

The Prophetic Message: A Call to Study and Understanding

This new interpretation, which reveals philosophy as the power that has influenced and ruled the world for 2,300 years, will not be understood and accepted by everyone. As divine revelation states, most people will not believe this message and will continue to live only for the present, for the "here and now," according to the guidelines of secular philosophy. Philosophy encourages a life focused on immediate and tangible things, without concern for the spiritual dimension or the future consequences of human actions. This way of life is exactly what the prophecy warns will dominate in the "time of the end."

Nevertheless, the call remains open to all who want to understand the truth. God has given this revelation to warn humanity and to give everyone the chance to recognize reality. Those who are eager to study and understand the prophecies must take heed of this sign and seek divine wisdom. Jesus Himself said, "Let the reader understand," indicating the crucial importance of understanding the prophetic message for our time.

God Is Sending a Message

Although most people will reject this warning and continue to live according to the values of philosophy, God knows all the people on earth and is doing everything possible to warn them of the imminent divine intervention. In His great mercy and justice, God will not leave humanity without a clear warning before He intervenes directly in the history of this world. He knows the hearts of men and knows who will listen and who will ignore this message.

The prophetic warnings are evidence of God’s care and love for all humanity. He does not wish to punish without first giving man the opportunity to understand and change. However, the time for warnings is limited, and divine intervention will inevitably come, whether people believe it or not. God’s intervention will be direct and will change the course of history, as all the prophets have foretold.

A Final Warning to All People

The words of Jesus: "Let the reader understand" are of paramount importance for this time. This is not just a message for the past, but a direct warning for all who live in the time of the end. This article is a call to all who seek to understand the truth revealed in Daniel’s prophecies. Now is the time to study and correctly understand this prophecy because the time of unsealing has arrived.

The domination of philosophy has ended, and God will intervene to put an end to this era of confusion and rejection of divine revelation. Now is the time to understand and prepare for what is to come. The message is clear and direct, and the writer of this article joins the divine call: "Let the reader understand."

Philosophers' Reason

The use of the word "reason" by philosophers is misleading

Philosophy, over time, has managed to position itself as a discipline that claims to investigate and define the deepest truths of existence. One of the central tools philosophers use is the concept of "REASON." Here, however, lies a fundamental problem: the use of the word "reason" by philosophers is misleading because it has nothing to do with what ordinary people understand by the term. In this article, we will explore how philosophers use the word "reason" in a way that creates confusion, making it seem as though their thinking is aligned with the common understanding of rationality, when in fact things are entirely different.

The Common Person's Reason: A Simple and Universal Capacity

For the average person, reason is something natural and accessible. It represents the ability to discern between right and wrong, to make logical choices in daily life, and to act based on common sense. Every individual’s native rationality helps them navigate the concrete world, fulfill their moral responsibilities, and understand the essential truths of life.

This reason is simple and practical, and the common person does not need complicated theories or abstract concepts to make the right decisions. For instance, when someone chooses to tell the truth instead of lying, the decision is based on a fundamental moral instinct supported by their natural reasoning. The average person lives according to these simple principles, guided by their conscience, without feeling the need to philosophize or complicate things to understand what is right and wrong.

Philosophical "Reason": A Terminological Trap

Philosophers, on the other hand, have developed a different concept, which they also call "REASON," but which has nothing to do with the reason used by ordinary people. This is where the first major problem arises: the use of the same word creates the false impression that philosophers are operating with the same cognitive tools as the average person when, in fact, they use an abstract and inaccessible form of reason.

This philosophical "REASON" is a complex theoretical construct, often disconnected from the practical reality of daily life. Philosophers claim that through this type of reason, they can discover higher, universal truths that the average person cannot reach. The problem arises when they use the same term that ordinary people use – "reason" – but give it a different meaning without clarifying this difference.

The Confusion Created by Using the Same Term

Through this linguistic maneuver, philosophers imply that the truths they reach through this philosophical REASON are in perfect continuity with what any rational person would understand by their native reason. This is the great "trick." Philosophers present their complex theories as the product of the same reason that the common person uses when making simple moral decisions. Thus, they create the impression that there is harmony between what they say and what any rational person would say, when in fact, they operate in a completely different dimension of thought.

The average person can therefore be misled into believing that philosophy is a natural extension of their own rational capacity when, in reality, philosophers are talking about something else entirely. This confusion is not a mere accidental misunderstanding but a direct consequence of philosophers choosing to use the same term for two different realities.

Why Don’t Philosophers Change the Term?

An important point is that if philosophers were to call what they do something else – for example, if they were to name their intellectual process with a completely new and different term, let’s say "XSDGASEWDSS" – it would immediately be obvious to everyone that what they do is fundamentally different from the natural reasoning of the common person. This way, a clear line would be drawn between philosophical thinking and common thinking, and people would understand that it is not the same kind of reasoning.

However, by using the same word, philosophers maintain an ambiguity that allows them to appear as though they are connected to the natural reason of the average person, when, in fact, they use a completely different method. Instead of clarifying this distinction, they choose to keep the confusion. This is the essence of the trick: they promote their philosophical truths as being the product of the same reason we all use, when in fact it is a highly artificial, complicated form of thought, often disconnected from practical reality.

The Consequences of Confusion: Philosophy's Distance from the People

This confusion, intentionally created between natural reason and philosophical REASON, leads to a growing distance between philosophers and ordinary people. Philosophers seem to speak the same language as us, but in reality, they use a different thought code. Thus, people who are not initiated into philosophical thinking are led to believe that the theories and concepts of philosophers are the result of a thinking process as accessible as their own. In reality, the truths promoted by philosophers are the product of a type of reasoning that has nothing to do with natural reason but is an artificial, complicated form of thinking, often detached from practical life.

Instead of being transparent and making this distinction clear, philosophers prefer to maintain this terminological confusion, thus consolidating their position as "holders of truth," while the average person is left to believe that what philosophers say aligns with their own reason.

Conclusion

The difference between the common person’s reason and what philosophers call "REASON" is enormous, though not always evident because of the use of the same word for two completely different things. Philosophers, through this ambiguous use of language, create confusion that leads people to believe their abstract and complicated truths are the result of the same reason that we all use. In reality, philosophers employ a different kind of thinking, separate from the natural and accessible reason of everyone.

If this difference were clarified and philosophers used another term to describe their intellectual process, it would be clear that there is a vast gap between natural reason and philosophical REASON. But by using the same word, philosophers maintain the illusion of continuity between their thinking and that of the common person, thus misleading the public. This is the essence of the philosophical "trick."

The Dogmas of Philosophy

Rules, Tactics, and Manipulations

Although philosophy was initially regarded as a search for truth through reason and reflection, ironically, over time, it developed its own dogmas, rules, and strategies to influence human thought. Modern philosophy, in particular, has created a set of principles that often contradict religious values and spiritual traditions. This "supreme reason" has essentially become an absolute standard for determining truth, replacing divine revelation and encouraging a skeptical and relativistic approach to all aspects of life.

1. “Supreme Reason” – Philosophy Over Divine Revelation
One of the greatest dogmas of modern philosophy is the idea that human reason is the only valid path to truth. This places reason above any form of revelation or religious belief. Philosophers like René Descartes promoted the idea that methodological doubt and critical reasoning are the only tools by which we can discover truth. His famous dictum “Cogito, ergo sum” (I think, therefore I am) emphasized the centrality of reason as the foundation of existence and knowledge.

Modern philosophy has increasingly marginalized the idea of divine revelation, dismissing it as subjective and lacking rational evidence. Immanuel Kant, for example, in his Critique of Pure Reason, argued that human reason is limited and cannot reach transcendental truths, but at the same time, he maintained that only through reason can we establish universal moral and ethical principles.

This “supreme reason” has often been used to replace or reinterpret spiritual and religious concepts. Philosophy has redefined ideas such as good, evil, morality, and the purpose of existence in rational and relative terms, minimizing the importance of faith and divine revelation in these areas. In this way, philosophy has subtly imposed a dogma of reason, considering any other source of knowledge inferior or invalid.

2. Philosophical Dogmatism – The Irony of Skepticism
Philosophy, especially through skepticism, constantly questions any kind of certainty or dogma. The paradox is that philosophy itself has developed a form of dogmatism of skepticism, where everything must be subjected to doubt, including fundamental values and religious beliefs.

Radical skepticism is, essentially, a form of dogma: any belief is uncertain until it can be proven through reason. David Hume, a renowned skeptic, argued that we cannot have certainty about causality or even the existence of the external world, claiming that all our knowledge is merely a habit of the mind. This type of thinking led to a form of philosophical relativism, where truth becomes something that cannot be established with certainty.

In a subtle irony, philosophy has created its own dogmas in the form of this extreme skepticism. Skepticism has been transformed into a kind of absolute belief in the uncertainty of all things, including spiritual and moral truths. Through this skepticism, philosophy questions the existence of an absolute truth or a divine source of knowledge, which directly contrasts with theologies that rely on divine revelation.

3. Manipulation through Language and Rhetoric
One of the most powerful and influential philosophical tactics is manipulation through language and rhetoric. Philosophy often uses complex concepts, subtle reasoning, and paradoxes to confuse or distort the truth. This technique is not only used to explore different theoretical possibilities but also to impose other values and interpretations of reality.

The Sophist philosophers of ancient Greece were the first to use language as a tool of manipulation. They were known for their ability to support contradictory arguments and win debates, regardless of the truth of the subject. These tactics were adopted by modern philosophers and used to redefine concepts of essence, morality, and truth.

For example, the doctrine of the Trinity in Christian theology was influenced by the philosophical concept of essence and substance, terms borrowed from the thinking of Aristotle and Plato. These philosophical concepts were applied to describe the divine nature of God but, in the process, brought about a departure from the original simplicity of the biblical message.

Philosophical manipulation of truth can be clearly seen in the way philosophy has imposed values and interpretations that contradict divine revelation. Philosophy can "cast truth to the ground," reinterpreting it through complicated and often contradictory reasoning. Instead of seeking the simple truth, philosophy has created complex systems of thought that distance people from the source of divine truth.

4. Conclusion: Philosophy and the Redefinition of Truth
Philosophy, although born from the desire to understand truth and explore the nature of reality, has developed its own dogmas, rules, and tactics for manipulating knowledge over time. Through supreme reason, dogmatic skepticism, and language manipulation, philosophy has succeeded in redefining essential concepts of truth, morality, and divine essence.

While skepticism and reason are important for critical thinking, their excessive use can lead to a relativization of truth and spiritual confusion. Philosophy has had a profound impact on religion and society, but it must be understood and analyzed with discernment to avoid falling into the subtle manipulation of fundamental concepts.

Philosophy can be a powerful tool for exploring truth, but it can also become a trap when its rational dogmatism and extreme skepticism attempt to replace divine revelation and spiritual values.

Philosophy in Politics and Society

Ideas and Manipulation

Throughout history, philosophy has played a significant role in shaping and influencing political and social structures. Through its ideas, political philosophy has contributed to the formation of societies and governments, to the development of concepts like rights and freedoms, and even to the justification of controversial political actions. Philosophy has not merely been an abstract domain of theoretical reflection but has had a profound practical applicability, shaping and manipulating collective thought from Plato to modern ideologies.

1. Political Philosophy: From Plato to John Locke and Karl Marx

The origins of political philosophy can be traced back to Ancient Greece, where Plato and Aristotle laid the foundations of thought on governance and society. In "The Republic," Plato envisions an ideal society governed by philosopher-kings, those who possess the wisdom necessary to make the right decisions. Plato argued that an ideal government should be led by those capable of understanding universal truth and good—those who have access to the world of ideas. This elitist vision of governance has had a major influence on subsequent political thought.

Aristotle, on the other hand, viewed politics as a practical science focused on balance and the common good. In his work "Politics," he argues that the state should be a community working for the happiness and prosperity of its citizens. He criticized tyrannical systems and advocated for a mixed form of governance that includes both democratic and aristocratic elements, thus anticipating modern ideas about balanced governance.

Over time, philosophers began shaping concepts of individual rights and freedoms, especially during the Enlightenment. John Locke, considered the father of liberalism, brought about a major shift with his vision of natural human rights. In his work "Two Treatises of Government," Locke argues that government must be legitimized by the consent of the governed and that fundamental rights, such as liberty and property, cannot be violated by the state. This vision was essential for the development of modern democracies and the idea that political power derives from the will of the people.

Karl Marx, on the other hand, turned political philosophy into a tool for radical societal change. In his work "The Communist Manifesto," Marx criticized economic inequalities and promoted the idea of a revolution to eliminate capitalism and create a classless society. Marx's philosophy decisively influenced 20th-century history, leading to the emergence of communist regimes and shaping left-wing political ideologies.

2. How Philosophical Ideas Influence Public Policies and Laws

Throughout history, philosophical ideas have been essential in developing laws and public policies. Philosophers such as Locke, Rousseau, and Montesquieu directly contributed to the principles on which many modern constitutions are based, including that of the United States. Ideas about the separation of powers, fundamental human rights, and popular sovereignty were philosophically grounded before being politically implemented.

Rousseau, in "The Social Contract," promoted the idea that governments exist through an implicit contract between the governed and the governors, and governmental authority must reflect the general will of the people. This idea influenced political revolutions in France and America, as well as many modern constitutions.

Montesquieu, in "The Spirit of the Laws," emphasized the need for the separation of powers—legislative, executive, and judicial—to prevent abuses of power. This idea had a tremendous impact on modern constitutions, including the American one.

Philosophy also influenced economic policies. Economic theories such as capitalism and communism are rooted in philosophical reflections on human nature and economic relationships. Adam Smith, in "The Wealth of Nations," laid the foundations of the free market economy, arguing that the "invisible hand" of the market regulates the economy better than any government intervention. These ideas led to the adoption of liberal economic policies, promoting deregulation and competition.

3. Modern Philosophy and Rationalism: Secularism and the Separation of Religion from State

Modern philosophy, especially beginning with the Enlightenment, brought about a major shift in how society views the relationship between religion and politics. Rationalism, promoted by philosophers such as Descartes and Spinoza, placed reason and critical thinking at the center of the search for truth, thus marginalizing the influence of religion on public and political life. This movement led to the progressive secularization of states and the separation of religion from government.

Secularism argues that governance and public institutions should be entirely separate from religion. This principle has been adopted in many Western democracies, where government and laws are not based on religious dogmas but on reason and universal human rights. This idea was clearly formulated by John Locke, who, in "A Letter Concerning Toleration," argues that church and state must be separate entities to protect religious freedom and prevent religious tyranny.

Immanuel Kant, in his work "Critique of Pure Reason," argued that human reason is capable of discovering universal moral principles and creating an ethical framework independent of religion. This idea led to the development of secularized moral theories and contributed to the justification of the separation of religion from state.

Modern philosophy and the Enlightenment laid the foundations for modern liberal democracy, human rights, and the idea of governance based on law, not religious dogmas or traditions. These ideas led to radical political changes, including the fall of absolute monarchies and the rise of republican states.

Conclusion
Philosophy has had a profound impact on the development of societies and governments throughout history. From Plato's concept of the ideal state to political revolutions influenced by Locke and Rousseau, and to communist regimes inspired by Marx, philosophy has often been at the root of major political and social changes. Additionally, rationalism and the Enlightenment paved the way for secularism and the separation of religion from the state, contributing to the creation of modern democratic societies. Political philosophy, though theoretical in essence, has demonstrated that ideas have the power to shape and transform political and social realities.

Jesus Faces Philosophy

A Confrontation between the Truth of Scripture and Philosophical Interpretations

During the life and ministry of Jesus, the conflict between Him and the Jewish religious leaders was not merely personal or political but represented a clash of principles: revealed truth versus the philosophical interpretations of Scripture. While Jesus delivered the pure message of the Scriptures, grounded in the Law and the Prophets of the Old Testament, the priests, Pharisees, and Sadducees had built a religious system contaminated by Greek philosophy, distorting God's original message.

1. The Truth of Scripture and Covenant Theology

Jesus based His entire ministry on the Scriptures of the Old Testament, presenting Himself as the fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets. In Matthew 5:17, Jesus declares, "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them." His message was clear: God did not leave humanity without guidance or divine revelation. The covenant between God and His people was established through obedience to His divine Law and faith in His promises. Truth was revealed by God through the Holy Spirit, not through human reasoning.

Additional details about Covenant Theology

Covenant Theology forms the backbone of the relationship between God and His chosen people, Israel. Essentially, this covenant was initiated by God through Moses and was an expression of divine grace toward the Jewish people. The covenant contained clear promises: blessings for obedience and adherence to the Law, and punishments for disobedience. Jesus presented Himself as the fulfillment of the prophecies related to this covenant, being the promised Savior who would bring salvation through perfect obedience to the Law and through His sacrifice.

However, during the Second Temple period (516 BC – AD 70), the Jewish religious leaders were deeply influenced by Greek philosophy and Hellenistic culture. This influence created tension between the tradition faithful to Scripture and the new interpretations of the Law, distorted by philosophical thinking.

2. The Pharisees and Religious Rules: A Rationalist Construction

The Pharisees were known for their devotion to strict observance of the Law. They believed that fulfilling the legal details was the key to obtaining righteousness before God. Though their original intent was good, philosophical influences led them to transform the Law into a system of complicated and narrow rules, which in essence nullified the spirit of Scripture.

The historical context of the formation of the Pharisees

The Pharisees emerged during the Second Temple period, around the 2nd century BC, as a religious group dedicated to protecting the purity of Mosaic law from Hellenistic influences. They positioned themselves as defenders of the Law and Jewish tradition, in contrast to the Sadducees, who were more aligned with aristocracy and political power. The name "Pharisee" comes from the Hebrew term "perushim," meaning "those separated," reflecting their desire to separate from any religious impurity.

Confrontation with Jesus

A significant example is the confrontation between Jesus and the Pharisees over Sabbath observance. In Matthew 12:1-14, the Pharisees accuse Jesus of violating the Sabbath because His disciples plucked heads of grain to satisfy their hunger. Jesus responds by appealing to Scripture, showing them that mercy and compassion are more important than rigid rules: "But I tell you that something greater than the temple is here. If you had known what these words mean, 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice,' you would not have condemned the innocent" (Matthew 12:6-7).

Here, Jesus restores the interpretation to the divine truth of Scripture, emphasizing that the spirit of the Law is mercy and love for people, not a mechanical application of rules. The Pharisees, influenced by legalism rooted in philosophical reasoning, had lost the essence of the relationship with God.

3. The Sadducees: Denial of Resurrection and Conflict with the Supernatural

Another major confrontation occurred between Jesus and the Sadducees, who, influenced by rationalism, rejected the resurrection of the dead and other supernatural concepts. Epicurean and Stoic philosophy, which emphasized materialism and reason, had led the Sadducees to deny the existence of angels, spirits, and resurrection.

The origin of the Sadducees

The Sadducees, unlike the Pharisees, came from aristocratic families and were associated with the Temple priesthood in Jerusalem. Their name likely derives from the high priest Zadok, who served during the reign of King David. This group gained a reputation for supporting a Judaism centered on the Temple and strict rituals related to Temple worship, but without recognizing the oral tradition of the Pharisees.

Confrontation with Jesus

In Matthew 22:23-33, the Sadducees challenge Jesus with a question about the resurrection, hoping to discredit Him. Jesus' response highlights their misunderstanding of Scripture, as they rely on philosophical reasoning rather than divine revelation: "You are in error because you do not know the Scriptures or the power of God." Jesus refers to Exodus 3:6 to demonstrate the resurrection, showing that God is a God of the living, not the dead.

Thus, Jesus combated the materialistic views of the Sadducees, showing that God operates beyond human reason and that His power is manifested in the supernatural. He emphasized that faith must be grounded in what God has revealed in Scripture, not on the limits imposed by philosophical thinking.

4. The Condemnation of Jesus

A Conflict between Philosophy of "Essences" and Divine Revelation

The final confrontation between Jesus and the Sanhedrin during His trial was influenced not only by theological considerations but also by philosophical concepts rooted in Greek thought, particularly in Aristotle's theories of "essences" and "substances." This philosophical view profoundly shaped how the religious leaders perceived the relationship between God and man, contributing to the condemnation of Jesus for what they considered blasphemy—a violation of their philosophical concepts of divine and human nature.

Philosophy of essences: A source of theological confusion

In Aristotelian philosophy, the concept of "essence" or "substance" represents the fundamental and immutable nature of a thing. Jewish religious leaders, who had developed their thinking under the influence of Hellenistic philosophy, applied this idea to their theology. For them, God was seen as an "essence" entirely distinct and separate from human nature, meaning that no human being could share in this essence or claim to be one with God. Thus, when Jesus declared Himself the Son of God, they interpreted this statement in the philosophical terms of essentialism, viewing it as a claim to share the same essence with God—an unpardonable blasphemy in their eyes.

Jesus and the revelation of Scripture: Truth based on Covenant

While the religious leaders based their accusations on the philosophical concept of essences, Jesus grounded His authority entirely in divine revelation and the Scriptures, not in philosophical speculations. The true key to understanding Jesus' position comes from the concept of the covenant, especially the covenant of the anointed one, which was a central theme in Israel's biblical history.

Jesus never claimed to share the same "essence" with God in Greek philosophical terms. Instead, He affirmed that He was the Son of God based on a revealed covenant, confirmed at His baptism when the Holy Spirit came upon Him and God's voice said, "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased" (Matthew 3:17). This moment marks Jesus' anointing as the Messiah, the special one sent by God to fulfill divine promises.

Jesus legitimized His status as the Son of God through the Scriptures, not through Greek philosophical concepts. In His discussion with the Jews, Jesus referred to Psalm 82:6, where God says, "I said, 'You are gods,'" showing that the term "gods" had already been applied in Scripture to those anointed by God with special authority. These individuals did not share the divine essence but had a relationship of responsibility and mission, being sent to administer justice in God's Name. Likewise, Jesus, as the Anointed One, came to bring the Truth about God, fully representing the Father. As He said, "Anyone who has seen Me has seen the Father" (John 14:9).

Philosophy of essences versus covenant revelation

Thus, the conflict between Jesus and the Sanhedrin was a confrontation between two fundamentally different ways of understanding the relationship between God and man. The religious leaders, influenced by Hellenistic philosophy, viewed this relationship in a fixed and static way, based on the concept of essence, which excluded any possibility of a human being having such a close relationship with God. On the other hand, Jesus showed that His relationship with the Father was not based on essence but on the covenant made between Him and the Father, which had been validated by the anointing with the Holy Spirit at His baptism. This covenant legitimized Him to present Himself as the Son of God without violating any philosophical or theological principle.

The religious leaders, through the lens of philosophy about essences, considered Jesus' claim to be the Son of God as blasphemy, as they understood this concept as a claim to share the same divine essence. In contrast, Jesus completely rejected this way of thinking, using the Scriptures to show that He was legitimate as the Son of God based on a covenant relationship, within which God had sent Him to bring salvation and reveal divine truth to the world.

Thus, while the Sanhedrin condemned Jesus based on a philosophical concept foreign to the truth of Scripture, Jesus relied solely on divine revelation, confirming that He was the Son of God not through "essence," but through the mission and anointing He had received at His baptism, as foretold in the Scriptures.

Conclusion

Jesus and His disciples found themselves in a continuous confrontation with Jewish religious leaders who based their beliefs on Hellenistic philosophy and human reasoning. While Jesus brought the clear message of divine truth, grounded in revelation from Scripture and the power of God, the Pharisees, Sadducees, and other religious leaders had constructed a belief system based on philosophical interpretations. This conflict between inspired Scripture and human philosophy culminated in the condemnation of Jesus, but the final victory of revealed truth was affirmed through His resurrection.

This confrontation between divine revelation and philosophical reasoning remains a lesson for those seeking to understand how philosophical influences can distort the Truth.

Philosophy and Revelation

The Conflict and God's Response

The conflict between philosophy and revelation is a deep tension that has shaped humanity since ancient times. Philosophy, based on reason and observation, has always challenged supernatural and divine truths, seeking to explain the world through the power of human thought. In contrast, revelation, as a direct manifestation of divinity, claims supreme authority over knowledge, offering absolute truths beyond human comprehension.

This confrontation was not merely an intellectual disagreement. It was a struggle for the control of knowledge and for defining how societies construct their fundamental understanding of the universe, morality, and truth. From the early disputes in Ancient Greece, through the Middle Ages and the Enlightenment, to the “death of God” proclaimed by modern philosophers, this struggle has profoundly influenced all civilizations, leaving deep marks on religion, politics, and science.

However, after two millennia of apparent divine silence, the sealed prophecy of Daniel 8 offers us a new perspective on this conflict, showing that God had anticipated everything that would happen with precision. Philosophy took on the role of the architect of human society, but revelation, through this prophecy, brings the final answer.

1. Ancient Greece: Oracles, Revelation, and the Birth of Philosophy

In Ancient Greece, oracles were regarded as essential sources of divine revelation. People from all walks of life came to consult the oracles, hoping that the gods would reveal the truth or provide guidance. The most famous of these, the Oracle of Delphi, became a central symbol of divine wisdom. For the Greeks, divine revelation was indisputable, and religion and politics were imbued with this supernatural vision.

However, this hegemony of revelation was questioned with the emergence of the first philosophers. Thales, Anaximander, and Heraclitus sought to explain reality through natural and rational methods without invoking divine intervention. Thales proposed that water was the primordial substance of the universe, and Heraclitus saw fire and constant change as the essence of reality. These theories were based on observation and reasoning, not on divine revelation.

The greatest rupture between revelation and reason came with Aristotle, a thinker who would forever change how humanity views knowledge. Aristotle asserted that human reason is the only valid source of truth, and knowledge must be acquired through observation and logical analysis. In his work Metaphysics, Aristotle systematized philosophy in a way that placed the human mind above any other source of knowledge.

This marked the beginning of an intellectual struggle that would last millennia and, for the first time, brought revelation into question.

2. Philosophy on the “International Stage”: From Greece to Alexandria and Beyond

With the conquests of Alexander the Great, Greek philosophy transcended its original boundaries and began to influence civilizations in the Middle East and India. The focal point of this expansion was the Library of Alexandria, founded around 283 BC. It was not merely a gathering place for knowledge but a “temple of philosophy,” where thinkers from all corners of the world met to debate philosophical, scientific, and religious ideas.

This period marked the beginning of philosophy’s influence on other cultures, including Judaism. Although Judaism had a much clearer relationship with revelation, based on God-given laws, Hellenism and Greek philosophy began to infiltrate Jewish thought, especially in sects like the Pharisees and Sadducees. The Pharisees, influenced by Platonism, believed in the immortality of the soul and resurrection, while the Sadducees, skeptics, denied these concepts and were closer to Hellenistic rationalism.

This infiltration of philosophy into religious thought set the stage for the time when Jesus came, and the religious leaders of the era, already influenced by philosophical concepts, challenged the fundamental elements of divine revelation. Philosophy began to undermine divine revelation, imposing rational thought as the source of knowledge, even within religious traditions.

3. Philosophy and Christianity: From Dogmas to the Enlightenment

With the spread of Christianity, philosophy began to play a central role in defining religious dogmas. Christian thinkers like Saint Augustine and Thomas Aquinas attempted to reconcile divine revelation with human reason. Augustine, influenced by Platonism, argued that reason can help understand faith, while Thomas Aquinas integrated Aristotle’s ideas into Christian theology.

This integration was not without consequences. Philosophy not only complemented revelation but profoundly transformed it. The most important doctrines of the Church, such as the Holy Trinity and the dual nature of Christ, were influenced by philosophical debates, not pure revelation. Philosophical ideas about essence and existence shaped central religious concepts.

• The Holy Trinity: This doctrine, essential to Christianity, was formulated in the context of medieval philosophical disputes, influenced by Neoplatonism.
• The Dual Nature of Christ: The debate about the divine and human nature of Christ was influenced by Greek philosophical concepts of being and essence.
• Original Sin: This is another Christian doctrine that does not exist in Judaism and was developed by Saint Augustine, influenced by philosophical ideas about human nature and sin. While the Old Testament, the source of Judaism, does not refer to original sin, Augustine introduced this concept to support a particular view of human nature and salvation, thus marking a clear philosophical influence on Christian theology.

While philosophy was used to support certain religious dogmas, it gradually brought revelation under the authority of reason. Instead of being a purely supernatural power, revelation became a domain that had to be philosophically explained and justified.

4. Modern Philosophy and the Denial of Revelation

With the Renaissance and the Enlightenment, philosophy resumed its frontal attacks on revelation, in a manner reminiscent of the challenges in Ancient Greece. Philosophy not only questioned revelation but came to openly deny it. Unlike the medieval period, when philosophy still maintained a “religious guise,” it now reemerged with absolute freedom of expression.

Philosophers such as René Descartes, John Locke, and David Hume advocated ideas that attacked the foundations of religious faith. Immanuel Kant and other Enlightenment thinkers emphasized that reason, not revelation, is the supreme source of knowledge. Gradually, revealed truth was replaced by a human-constructed truth, independent of any divine authority.

This open attack on revelation is perfectly reflected in the prophecy of Daniel 8, where the little horn, symbolizing philosophy, is described as follows: “In the latter part of their reign, when rebels have become completely wicked, a fierce-looking king, a master of intrigue, will arise...” (Daniel 8:23)

This description is a direct reference to how modern philosophy, unrestrained, proclaimed the death of God and openly challenged revelation. Philosophy, freed from all constraints, assumed the role of the architect of truth in society.

5. “The Death of God” and Philosophy’s Attacks

The culmination of this evolution was reached in the 19th century when Friedrich Nietzsche declared, “God is dead.” This was not just a provocative statement but a reflection of the intellectual and cultural reality of that time. Philosophy, through rationalism and empiricism, had come to completely reject the idea of divine revelation.

Moreover, philosophy developed diametrically opposed ideas yet presented them simultaneously as “valid truths.” For example, capitalism and communism, two opposing philosophical ideologies, were seen as possible solutions for organizing society. Modern philosophy created an intellectual landscape where truth became relative and subjective, and the confusion between good and evil deepened.

This juggling of truths and concepts is illustrated by the prophecy in Daniel 8:23, where the “fierce-looking king, a master of intrigue” represents philosophy, which, without fear or restraint, assumed control over knowledge and society.

6. The Prophecy of Daniel 8: How God Views Philosophy

The prophecy in Daniel 8 is an exact description of philosophy and its influence on divine revelation over a period of 2,300 years. Philosophy, symbolized by the little horn, is the force that arose from Ancient Greece and continued to challenge divine revelation.

“Out of one of them came another horn, which started small but grew in power to the south and the east and toward the Beautiful Land. It grew until it reached the host of the heavens, and it threw some of the starry host down to the earth and trampled on them. It set itself up to be as great as the commander of the army of the Lord; it took away the daily sacrifice from the Lord, and his sanctuary was thrown down.” (Daniel 8:9-11)

This prophecy perfectly describes how philosophy undermined divine authority, “trampling” on the sacred foundations of revelation and replacing them with human reason. God allowed philosophy to manifest freely, but this prophecy shows that the reckoning is near and that the period of philosophy’s dominance will come to an end.

7. Conclusion: God Was Not Surprised – Revelation Triumphs

God’s silence in the face of this rise of philosophy was not a sign of absence but a divine strategy. The sealed prophecy of Daniel 8 is God’s final answer, showing that He not only knew in advance about the rise of philosophy but also anticipated everything that would happen.

At the end of the 2,300-year period, revelation triumphs, showing that divine truth cannot be defeated. Philosophy has shaped human society and attacked revelation, but God has always had the final control. Through this prophecy, He shows us that His truth has remained intact, and the period of “silence” has ended.

Philosophy and the Game of Truth

How Philosophers and Theologians Move Beyond Reason

Throughout history, philosophy and theology have been closely linked to what it means to hold authority over the truth. These fields, seemingly dedicated to exploring critical thinking and revelatory spirit, have placed control over authority at the center of their activities. However, more than that, they have developed a subtle and often elusive ability to confuse and divert discussions when the Truth becomes too clear and too difficult to contest. In this article, we will explore how this mechanism operates, particularly through the lens of an apparently simple yet deeply significant biblical prophecy: the Little Horn from Daniel 8.

Philosophers and Theologians: Who Really is the "Little Horn"?

The Little Horn from the prophecy in Daniel 8 is a controversial subject among theologians and philosophers. Two major interpretations revolve around Antiochus Epiphanes. Some theologians "close" the prophecy with him, while others "resurrect" him 2,300 years later as a sort of antichrist in the end times. But regardless of the version, in both cases, Antiochus becomes the symbol of the "Little Horn."

The fundamental problem with this interpretation is that it ignores the chronological evidence and logic of the prophecy. According to the text in Daniel, the Little Horn is a power that not only rises from Greece but remains active and influential for an extremely long period, until the "end times." Yet Antiochus Epiphanes is a figure limited by time, having a strictly localized influence in the 2nd century BC. So why do these interpretations continue to link Antiochus with the "Little Horn"? It’s simple: to avoid what is evident.

Philosophy as the Only Realistic Alternative

If Antiochus Epiphanes cannot be the Little Horn, then who can it be? Well, the answer becomes clear if we trace not only the time and place of the horn’s expansion but also the nature of its activities. The Little Horn is a force that rises in Ancient Greece, remains active for 2,300 years, and focuses its efforts on challenging and undermining divine authority and revelation. This is an almost exact description of philosophy.

Philosophy emerged in Ancient Greece and, through great thinkers like Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, began to challenge any form of authority that didn’t pass through the filter of human reason. Since then, philosophy has profoundly influenced every aspect of society, from religion to science, politics, and ethics. In short, philosophy has contested divine authority and created a new form of authority: human reason.

The Game of Interpretations and the "Cunning" of Philosophers and Theologians

Here is where the real challenge arises. When confronted with this simple truth, many theologians and philosophers retreat behind a complex dialectical game, full of nuances and subtleties. Why? Because acknowledging philosophy as the Little Horn would mean undermining their own authority, as the "horn of reason" in the prophecy is not the reason of all people, but that of philosophers who have assumed the role of arbiters of truth.

Philosophers do not seek truth for everyone but for themselves. In other words, they do not use reason as a universal tool but monopolize it and use it to dictate what is true and what is not. This is why, even when faced with a clear and coherent argument, they attempt to divert the discussion toward unnecessary complexities, relativize the Truth, and create confusion. It is a subtle game of intellectual cunning, where they control the rules.

Dialogue with Theologians: A Conversation with "Closed Curtains"

Unfortunately, theologians are not much different. Although they claim to rely on revelation and Scriptures, in reality, they often fall into the same philosophical trap. They wish to maintain a dogmatic authority, where the truth is decided by tradition and religious elites, not by authentic revelation.

As mentioned, dialogue with them often becomes a "dialogue of fools," where everyone avoids confronting the truth. Instead of engaging in an honest and open discussion, theologians resort to ambiguities and relativism, just like philosophers. This is the strategy to prevent the truth from being recognized and accepted. They know that a clear truth could undermine the control they have over the interpretation of Scriptures and religious dogmas.

What Does Daniel 8 Say? A Simple Question with an Obvious Answer

The prophecy in Daniel 8 is simple but filled with profound meanings. It describes a power that originates in Ancient Greece and will play a central role in challenging divine authority over a long period of 2,300 years. It will "rise up" against spiritual truths, "cast down" the continual sacrifice, and destroy many of the foundations of faith.

Using this description, there is no other force that meets all these criteria except for philosophy. Philosophy rose in Ancient Greece and has remained active to this day, influencing not only theology but also politics, science, and society as a whole. No other power—neither Antiochus Epiphanes nor any other historical figure—can claim a 2,300-year influence focused on undermining divine revelation.

Conclusion: Philosophy is the Little Horn

As history proves, the Little Horn from Daniel 8 cannot be Antiochus Epiphanes, and all attempts to link him to this prophecy are full of gaps and contradictions. Why would the angel speak of "distant times" in the case of a historical figure who lived during the prophecy of the "70 weeks"? It makes no sense. Instead, all the evidence clearly shows that Philosophy is the only force that rose from Ancient Greece, has been active for 2,300 years, and has continually undermined divine Revelation.

Philosophers and theologians may try to evade this truth, complicate it, or dilute it, but the arguments remain clear. Philosophy is the Little Horn. If it isn’t Philosophy, then who else could it be?