PAUL CSAVDARI



An Extraordinary Discovery in the Prophecy of Daniel 8




In a moment of rare and revealing discovery, a prophecy that is thousands of years old

from the book of Daniel is now becoming clear.


In the quest to understand the end times, many have turned to the words of Jesus in Matthew 24. I too began to study this chapter, where Jesus speaks about the "signs of the end," urging us to watch and be prepared, just as those who, seeing the fig tree's buds, know that summer is near. But I realized that the signs He offers are so general that they have been applicable to every generation since then. This led me to a dilemma: how can the final generation recognize the imminent signs of the end if the same signs were given to every generation?


Moreover, Jesus speaks of a "faithful servant" who must provide "food at the proper time." But how can this servant know the moment of the "proper time" if no specific sign was given? It seems that Jesus leaves the final generation without a clear hint, only with generalities. And the "sign of the Son of Man," the only explicitly mentioned sign, appears too late—at the very moment of Jesus' return. What good is such a "sign" if it coincides with the event itself, offering no prior warning?


For those in Jerusalem, Jesus provided a clear sign: "the abomination of desolation." He explicitly referred them to the book of Daniel, saying, "let the reader understand." So, I began to search the prophecies of Daniel.


At first, I turned to chapter 9 of Daniel, where it speaks about the "desolation" of Jerusalem, an event that was to occur in 70 AD. In this chapter, I found the terms "abomination" and "desolation," which clearly pointed to the destruction of Jerusalem. But I noticed that the exact expression "abomination of desolation," as it appears in Matthew 24, is not used here.


I continued my search and discovered that this exact phrase appears in chapter 8 of Daniel. Here, the prophecy no longer refers to the destruction of Jerusalem but to the end of the age. Chapter 8 speaks of the "little horn" and its reign for 2,300 evenings and mornings, a critical detail for understanding the end times.


The Study of All Existing Interpretations of the "Little Horn"

Initially, I reviewed all traditional interpretations and carefully analyzed each one. I saw exactly what they said and, more importantly, I discovered why they do not perfectly match all the details in the text. After this analysis, I began to consider a well-documented fact: the only force that rose from Ancient Greece and has remained in effect to this day is philosophy. This force has continued to influence the world not only in the past but also in the present.


When I introduced philosophy into the context of the prophecy, suddenly, all the details fit perfectly. It was as if the sky had cleared—every element became clear, and the prophecy, which had been sealed for millennia, opened before my eyes. I myself was amazed by the clarity with which all the details of the prophecy made sense, revealing that the sign intended for the final generation had finally been uncovered.


The historical issue:

According to historical evidence, the period of the FOUR HELLENISTIC KINGDOMS, which followed the death of Alexander the Great, ended around 280 B.C.

After Alexander's death, the four main kingdoms formed. Let's review what happened to them:

The Ptolemaic Kingdom (Egypt): survived until 30 B.C., when it was conquered by Rome.
The Seleucid Kingdom (Syria and Babylon): survived until 63 B.C., when it was conquered by Rome.
The Macedonian Kingdom (Antigonid): survived until 168 B.C., when it was conquered by Rome at the Battle of Pydna.
The Lysimachid Kingdom (Thrace and Asia Minor): disappeared in 281 B.C.


So, after the year 280 B.C., there can no longer be talk of FOUR KINGDOMS, but only three. However, the prophecy speaks of four horns and four kingdoms, hence THIS IS THE MOMENT when the domination of the "little horn" indicated by prophecy must begin.


2,300 Years and the Unsealing of the Prophecy

The year 280 B.C. was the year when the "way" was opened for the appearance of the "little horn," and the 2300-year period began to unfold. The prophecy clearly mentions that, at the end of this period, the "Sanctuary" will be cleansed.


According to the prophetic text, the period of the four Hellenistic kingdoms, which followed the death of Alexander the Great, ended around 280 BC. This was the moment when the "way" was opened for the emergence of the "little horn," and the 2,300-year period began to unfold. The prophecy clearly states that at the end of this period, "the Sanctuary will be cleansed."


This 2,300-year period extends to the year 2020, the year when the prophetic calculation was completed. Today, in 2024, we have, for the first time, this clear interpretation before us, and its significance is profound: the unsealing of the prophecy shows us that the "little horn" represents Philosophy.


This is the revelation that the unsealing brings. No one could understand this until now, which explains why traditional interpretations, such as the one identifying Antiochus Epiphanes as the "little horn," have always been incomplete and unable to integrate all the details from the text. Now we can see clearly that philosophy, and not a political or military figure, is the power that has challenged divine values, undermined religious authority, and had a global impact over time, just as the prophecy describes.


Philosophy—the Power that Redefined Religion and Divine Values

Philosophy was the force that not only influenced intellectual thinking but also had a devastating impact on how people relate to religion and divinity. It challenged divine truths, redefining conceptions of morality and spirituality, and profaned God’s "Sanctuary" not just physically, but also spiritually. Philosophy undermined divine authority, "trampling underfoot" everything that was considered sacred, and influenced all areas of life, including religion.


This intellectual power, subtle yet strong, has continued to shape human civilization to this day, having a profound impact on all aspects of life. Now, in 2024, we can clearly understand that the "little horn" in Daniel 8 is not just a past political or military power but a force that has continued to influence the entire world until the end of the age.


Conclusion: Recognize the Sign and Prepare

Now that the prophecy has been unsealed and the sign given by Jesus has been revealed, it is time to recognize the reality of this influence on our world. Philosophy, the "little horn," has fulfilled its prophetic role, and its reign is nearing its end. We are at the doors of the end, and the final events can begin at any moment.


This interpretation is not based on speculation, but is the result of a rigorous analysis, grounded in theological, historical, and philosophical evidence, which can be verified by anyone.


  1. The prophet Daniel receives a vision and says, "I was astonished by the vision, and no one understood it."
  2. It refers to the "little horn" from chapter 8.
  3. "The vision concerns the time of the end!"
  4. "Seal up the vision, for it concerns distant times."
  5. "Until two thousand three hundred evenings and mornings pass; then the Holy Place will be cleansed!"
  6. "And the vision of the evenings and mornings that has been spoken of is true. Seal up the vision, for it concerns distant times."
  7. Thus, the interpretation of the vision will only be understood then.
  8. All of Alexander the Great’s generals ended their lives in 280 B.C.
  9. Some consider Antiochus Epiphanes to be the "little horn"; this interpretation is old and well-known.
  10. This is a clear argument that this is NOT the correct interpretation because it must appear only at the time of the end, meaning "distant times."
  11. Now, in the year 2024, a new and unique interpretation has appeared.
  12. Those interested in understanding Daniel’s prophecy would do well to take heed and "read and understand," as Jesus Himself said.
  13. The new interpretation is that the "little horn" represents philosophy, an ideology based on the rejection of any divine revelation.
  14. Philosophy considers ALL religious writings worldwide, without exception, as products of human imagination and illusion.
  15. Antiochus Epiphanes was motivated in what he did precisely by this philosophical idea.
  16. He issued a decree, see Antiochus IV Epiphanes’ Decree on the Cessation of Traditional Teaching in Favor of Greek Philosophy (circa 167 B.C.).
  17. His actions are only a small part of what philosophers have said and done over these 2300 years (1 day = 1 year).
  18. God was even declared "dead" by philosophers.
  19. Philosophy has always attacked revelation, either by destroying it or by "reinterpreting" it based on its own dogmas.
  20. Philosophy was active during the time of Jesus through the Pharisees and Sadducees, who had already adopted and implemented philosophical ideas into Jewish religion.
  21. Jesus was in conflict with them and exposed their ideas as erroneous and opposed to the Revelation received from God through the prophets and preserved in the Old Testament Scriptures.
  22. Jesus lived about 200 years after Antiochus Epiphanes, and yet the "time of the end" was still distant.
  23. This is what Jesus told His disciples when they asked Him, "What will be the sign of Your coming and of the end of the age?"
  24. It was the year 30 A.D., and the Temple still stood.
  25. Therefore, the "Holy Place" mentioned in the prophecy does not refer to this Temple.
  26. The activity of the "little horn" was far from being realized; Antiochus and what he did was only a small sequence in the long history of its activity over 2300 years, beginning in 280 B.C. when Philosophy became the new power in the world and expanded greatly, while Antiochus was merely a local ruler, far inferior to what Constantine the Great or his generals had been.
  27. Philosophy spread throughout the Roman Empire and beyond, and today it practically rules the world, having full authority over all the states that were formed exclusively on philosophical foundations.
  28. Religions have been and still are subjected to Philosophy, either by imposing dogmas that align with Philosophy or by being forced to do so through civil laws.
  29. In this way, Philosophy has imposed its own ideas in everything, in ANY dwelling of God.
  30. This is because God allowed it to do all these things, but only up to a point, until 2300 years have passed, then, without human intervention, He will INTERVENE and stop this madness and blasphemy.
  31. God does not need anyone’s "help"; He can defend Himself.
  32. This action of God cannot be stopped or "helped"; it is exclusively God's action.
  33. It was announced by Jesus in His discourse in Matthew 24, as well as by all the prophets in the Old and New Testaments.
  34. Additionally, the Creator’s intervention is presented not only in the Bible but also in all other revelations found in the world’s religions.
  35. Philosophy is the "little horn" THAT HAS BECOME GIGANTIC and has expanded in all directions so that today IT RULES THE ENTIRE WORLD.
  36. This interpretation is NEW AND UNKNOWN to the world because only now has the time come to understand it.
  37. This very detail—that a NEW INTERPRETATION of this prophecy meant for the "time of the end" has appeared—should be a SIGN that it must be studied carefully by anyone who still BELIEVES IN GOD’S REVELATION.
  38. Revelation makes it clear that most will not believe and will continue to live only for the HERE AND NOW, as Philosophy demands.
  39. However, God knows all the people on the face of the earth and does everything possible to warn them of the impending DIRECT INTERVENTION in the history of this world.
  40. "Whoever reads, let them understand," said Jesus.



PAUL CSAVDARI



Unsealing the Prophecy of Daniel



Jesus’ Reference to the Prophecy of Daniel


In His discourse in Matthew 24, Jesus speaks about the signs of the end times and warns His disciples to stay vigilant regarding the events that will take place.



One of the most important points of this discourse is the reference to the "abomination of desolation," a specific sign meant for the generation living in Jerusalem, after which Jesus urges the faithful to "read and understand" what the prophet Daniel had said. This direct reference to Daniel suggests that his prophecies are crucial not only for that time but also for the events of the end times.


:However, unlike the specific signs given to the generation in Jerusalem (such as the "abomination" and the "vultures"), we are told that the "sign of the Son of Man" will appear in the sky. This sign, meant exclusively for the final generation, is the ultimate warning and an indicator that Jesus' return is imminent. The sign of the Son of Man is not just different from the other signs but serves as a clear message to those living in the last days, confirming the promises of Jesus.


Daniel’s Prophecy and the Little Horn: A Revelation for the End Times

The Book of Daniel contains a series of complex visions and prophecies, and one of the most enigmatic and difficult to decipher is that of the "little horn" in chapter 8. The prophecy speaks of a horn that rises from one of the four kingdoms of ancient Greece, exhibiting a cunning and destructive power directed against God's people and divine truth. For centuries, the identity of this horn remained shrouded in mystery and was not fully understood, being the only essential prophecy in Daniel that had not been clearly interpreted until now.


Through careful study and correlation of historical facts with the prophetic text, we have come to understand that this little horn represents philosophy—a powerful intellectual force that has profoundly shaped and influenced the world and humanity's relationship with divinity. This interpretation not only opens a new perspective on understanding the end times but also serves as clear and undeniable proof of God's faithfulness to His words.


The Calculation of the Prophecy and Its Relevance in 2024

Of course, the unsealing of the prophecy would not be complete without a simple calculation that helped us understand the prophetic period of 2300 evenings and mornings mentioned in Daniel's vision: 280 BC+2020 = 2300. We discovered that this period begins around 280 BC, marking the rise of philosophy as a dominant power and culminating in our present day. This synchronization of historical events with biblical prophecy not only validates the divine message but also offers us a clear perspective on the "end times" in which we live.


The Sign of the Son of Man and Daniel’s Prophecy: An Essential Connection

An essential detail in Matthew 24 is Jesus' mention of the sign of the Son of Man, which will appear in the "heavens" before His coming on the clouds of heaven. In the chronology of events described, this sign does not serve to strengthen the faith of those who have not believed but to instill fear and dread in their hearts. However, for those who believe and have understood the message of prophecy, this sign is the final warning that confirms the hour appointed by God has come.


This parallel with the prophecy of Daniel, initially sealed to be opened only in the end times, emphasizes that its message is intended precisely for this moment in history. The importance of the unsealing is that it provides clear and indisputable confirmation of divine control over events. If the prophecy had been unsealed too early, it would have been misinterpreted or ignored, but the fact that it becomes clear now underscores that it is a message for today's generation.


Unsealing the Prophecy: What It Means for Us

Daniel's prophecy remained shrouded in mystery for centuries, but its "unsealing" in the current context conveys a vital message to us. This revelation, according to Scripture, was reserved for the "end times," a period when humanity faces major challenges and prepares for the return of Jesus. The message God is conveying to us now, is clear and significant.


  1. God never withdrew from the history of the earth. Despite erroneous interpretations that suggest God withdrew because of Adam and Eve’s "original sin," the truth is that God has continued to work actively in human history. This idea of "separation" between God and people was heavily promoted by Greek philosophy and perpetuated through various religious dogmas that sought to impose these interpretations by force. However, the reality is that God remained present and active, guiding history and maintaining control over all things.

  2. God has absolute control over history. Daniel's prophecy proves that nothing is unknown to God. Every detail of the events described in the vision—from the rise of Alexander the Great's Greece to the destructive influence of Greek philosophy on the world—was predicted with an accuracy that surpasses human imagination. This shows us that God knows every stage of history, even before it happens. For us, living now, this certainty is a source of hope and confidence that God has never lost control, not for a single moment.

  3. The struggle against truth is allowed only for a time. Philosophy, represented as the little horn, was permitted to act as a force opposing divine truth. From Plato and Aristotle to modern philosophical systems, ideas born from sources other than divine inspiration have constantly challenged the teachings of Scripture. However, the fact that the prophecy clearly reveals the identity of this force shows that God is not indifferent. He allows this opposition only up to a point, and the prophecy is given to strengthen us and show that Jesus’ coming is near, being the only solution that will end this millennial conflict.

  4. The relevance of the prophecy does not depend on public acceptance. The importance of this revelation does not lie in how popular the interpretation is, but in the fact that it represents a divine message reserved for the end times. Daniel's prophecy was sealed to prevent speculation and to be discovered at the appropriate time, offering a clear warning to those who wish to understand the truth.

  5. A call for personal study and independent thinking. This unsealing that we present here is not a decree but the result of careful study of Scripture and history. Each reader is encouraged to research for themselves, compare the evidence, and form their own opinion, guided by God in understanding the truth. The message is not just to accept what is presented but to seek and form convictions based on sincere personal study.


The discovery of the identity of the little horn as philosophy has profound implications for our theological understanding. It proves that philosophical ideas, no matter how sophisticated, are not merely harmless intellectual speculations but represent an open front against the truth revealed by God. The conflict between these two worlds—the world of philosophy and the world of faith—is an ongoing struggle, with the stakes being the very nature of the relationship between man and God.


By unsealing this prophecy, we are called to recognize that divine truth has been preserved and protected for the "end times," exactly for this period of intense spiritual confrontation. The sign of the Son of Man, hidden in Daniel's prophecy, is now revealed and directly calls us to strengthen our faith, avoid being deceived by philosophical cunning, and prepare for the glorious return of Jesus.


The prophet Daniel not only showed us what has been but also gave us what is most needed now: a certainty that God is active, that His plans are not thwarted by the powers of this world, and that despite challenges and suffering, faith in God and in the coming of the Son of Man is the foundation on which we can confidently build.


Conclusion: Hope in the Time of the "End"

In the face of the difficulties of our times, this revelation is not merely a historical fact but a call to spiritual resistance. It is the necessary nourishment for weary and doubtful souls. We are assured that the coming of Jesus is closer than ever, and the prophecy gives us the strength to stand firm, strengthen our faith, and await with joy and confidence the fulfillment of the divine promise.



PAUL CSAVDARI



Philosophy is the "Little Horn"


Arguments and Evidence



The prophecy in Daniel 8 has long been a subject of intense debate and interpretation. Many have tried to decipher the identity of the "little horn," but most interpretations have not fully aligned with the biblical text, leading to inconsistencies and chronological errors. Today, through a detailed analysis and an objective approach, we bring to light a surprising but perfectly aligned interpretation: philosophy is, in fact, the little horn—a cunning and dominant force that decisively influenced the spiritual and intellectual course of world history.


The Context of the Prophecy and the Problem of Interpretation
Daniel 8 describes the rise and fall of two great powers—Medo-Persia (symbolized by the ram with two horns) and Greece (symbolized by the goat with a large horn, representing Alexander the Great). After Alexander's death, his empire was divided among his four generals, and from one of them arose a "little horn" that grew exceedingly great, persecuting the saints, attacking the "Sanctuary," and profaning the truth.


Traditional interpretations have often identified the little horn with Antiochus IV Epiphanes, a Seleucid king who profaned the Temple in Jerusalem in 167 BC. However, this interpretation contains several inconsistencies and does not fulfill all the details of the text, such as "the time of the end" or the description of a power that will last until the "cleansing of the Sanctuary" after 2300 evenings and mornings (years).


Philosophy as the "Little Horn"
We have concluded that the "little horn" is not a specific military or political leader but Greek philosophy—an intellectual power that rose precisely at the end of the rule of the four Hellenistic kingdoms, profoundly influencing religion, culture, and divine order.

Key Arguments Supporting Philosophy as the "Little Horn"


  1. Emergence and Expansion in 280 BC: The year 280 BC marks the end of the rule of Alexander's generals and the founding of the Library of Alexandria, a "temple" of philosophy where Greek ideas were cultivated and widely disseminated. This coincides exactly with the description of "the end of their reign" and is a clear starting point for the "little horn."

  2. Cunning and Manipulation of Truth: Philosophy has constantly redefined truth, challenging absolutes and overturning divine values. From rationalism to relativism, philosophy has opposed faith, replacing revelation with human reason and undermining sacred principles, exactly as described in the text.

  3. Attack on the "Sanctuary": The profaning of the "Sanctuary" is not only physical but also spiritual and conceptual. Philosophy attacked sacred beliefs and undermined divine authority, even influencing the translation of Scriptures, as was the case with the Septuagint, which emerged in this Hellenistic and philosophical context.

  4. Expansion in All Directions: Philosophy expanded southward (to Egypt), eastward (Asia Minor and the Near East), and to the "Glorious Land" (Israel), not through military conquests but through the power of ideas. The West is not mentioned because the West "adopted" philosophy, making it the foundation of its cultural and political life.

  5. Synchronization with the 2300-Year Prophecy: Interpreting 280 BC as a starting point and the specification "when transgressors have reached their fullness" suggests a time of divine grace but confirms that we are very close to the end of this prophetic period. We cannot establish the exact starting moment, but we know we are at the end when everything is "ripe."


Implications of the Discovery: "Sealed" Until "Far-Off Times"

This discovery is not accidental. The text in Daniel 8:26 clearly says, "Seal up the vision, for it concerns distant times." The fact that this interpretation becomes clear now, at the end of the 2300 years, is a sign that we are in those "far-off times" and that the truth is now being revealed. We are the ones witnessing the unsealing of this vision and living in the moment when the "Sanctuary" is about to be cleansed.


A simple calculation clearly shows where we are on the prophetic timeline: 280 BC + 2024 AD = 2304. This result is astonishing and highlights that we are in a period of "waiting," marked by one single detail, strategically placed in the text by DIVINE INSPIRATION: "when transgressors have reached their fullness." This detail makes it impossible to establish the exact Day and Hour but shows us that we are precisely in the final period, awaiting only one decision—the Father’s.


When this decision is made, we will witness the apocalyptic events described throughout the Bible. From now on, we can say without hesitation: THERE IS NO MORE PROPHETIC TIME. We are no longer conditioned by the passage of a prophetic time period, but only by divine will.


Conclusion: A Call to Understanding and Vigilance
The discovery that philosophy is the "little horn" is a revelation of great importance. It not only offers a clear and faithful understanding of the biblical text but also a call to vigilance and preparation, as we are in the final period of a prophecy fulfilled in detail. It is time to recognize the signs and understand that all these things have been left for "our times," when the truth is restored and the Sanctuary will be cleansed.


There is no more prophetic time, only a time of grace. What follows is only the decision of the Father, and then we will witness the final fulfillment of the divine plan.

ChatGPT



How Faithful Is Each One to the Text?


Comparing the Interpretations of Daniel 8's Prophecy



Introduction: The Importance of Faithfulness to the Text

The prophecy in Daniel 8 has been debated and interpreted for centuries, being one of the most complex biblical visions. Various churches and Christian denominations have offered different interpretations of this prophecy, attempting to identify who "the little horn" is and what the events described symbolize. A key method of evaluating the value of these interpretations is their faithfulness to the biblical text. How closely does a particular interpretation align with the details presented in the prophecy? We will compare several well-known interpretations and provide a percentage evaluation of each.


1. Traditional Interpretation: Antiochus Epiphanes

One of the oldest and most widespread interpretations is that "the little horn" represents Antiochus Epiphanes, a Seleucid king who ruled in the 2nd century BC. He is known for desecrating the Temple in Jerusalem and persecuting the Jewish people. This interpretation is based on historical facts regarding the Hellenistic domination over Israel and Antiochus' attempts to impose Hellenism, banning Jewish religious practices.

Strengths of the interpretation:

  • It matches historical details about the desecration of the Temple and the persecution of Jews.
  • The period described in the text partly corresponds with Antiochus' reign.

Weaknesses:

  • The prophecy speaks of "the time of the end," and Antiochus was not a figure of the end times.
  • The text suggests that this power will be destroyed "without human hands," which does not apply to Antiochus' death.
  • The little horn, in the text, expands greatly in multiple directions, including over "the Beautiful Land," which does not completely correspond to Antiochus' expansion.

Percentage evaluation of faithfulness to the text: 60%


2. Historicist Interpretation: The Catholic Church

Another common interpretation identifies "the little horn" with the Catholic Church, more specifically with the papacy. In this view, the little horn represents a religious and political power that persecutes God's people and alters divine truths. This interpretation is often found in Protestant circles, especially associated with the Reformation and attempts to expose the corruption of the church during the Middle Ages.

Strengths of the interpretation:

  • It partially fits the role of the papacy in medieval Europe and its influence over religion.
  • The Catholic Church played a major role in persecuting those who opposed official dogmas.

Weaknesses:

  • The "little horn" in Daniel appears in the context of ancient Greece, not Rome.
  • The text speaks of a power that expands rapidly and is eventually destroyed without human help, which does not correspond to the papacy's history.
  • This interpretation requires the forcing of symbols and historical periods that are not obvious in the text.

Percentage evaluation of faithfulness to the text: 50%


3. Futurist Interpretation: The Antichrist

Another perspective, found in modern eschatological circles, is that "the little horn" represents a future manifestation of the Antichrist, who will rise at the end of times. In this interpretation, the prophecy refers to a final leader who will persecute believers and profane true worship before Jesus' return.

Strengths of the interpretation:

  • It aligns with the concept of "the time of the end" mentioned in the prophecy.
  • It connects with other biblical passages that speak about the Antichrist and the "end times."

Weaknesses:

  • The little horn in Daniel 8 is tied to ancient Greece, which does not align with the idea of a future power.
  • This interpretation relies more on passages from Revelation and Thessalonians, without being clearly justified in Daniel 8.
  • There is no clear evidence in the text that it should be interpreted in such a distant future context.

Percentage evaluation of faithfulness to the text: 40%


4. Realistic and Complete Interpretation: Philosophy as the "Little Horn"

Following the study of the text of Daniel 8 and history, I have concluded that "the little horn" actually represents Philosophy, an intellectual and spiritual force that arose from ancient Greece and radically shaped the way religion and society were perceived. Philosophy had a direct impact on religious teachings, influencing the development of dogmas and the way the Church interpreted the Scriptures.

Strengths of the interpretation:

  • The "little horn" emerges from ancient Greece, and Philosophy was one of the most influential forces that shaped Greek and global thought.
  • Philosophy continued to have a major influence on religion and dogma, "changing the truth" and influencing the creation of doctrines that are not in harmony with Scripture.
  • History confirms the influence of philosophy on Christianity and Western thought, and the period in which it appeared precisely corresponds with the details in Daniel's prophecy.
  • The text suggests that this power will be "broken without human hand," and philosophy, as an abstract idea and influence, fits perfectly with this aspect.

Weaknesses:

  • This interpretation is less familiar to the general public and may require deeper historical and theological analysis to be accepted.

Percentage evaluation of faithfulness to the text: 100%


Conclusion: Which is the Most Faithful Interpretation?

Of all the interpretations discussed, the one that identifies "the little horn" with Philosophy is the most faithful to the prophecy in Daniel 8. It corresponds to both the historical context and the symbolic details of the prophecy, without forcing interpretations or introducing elements that are not supported by the text. Philosophy profoundly influenced the development of religious dogmas and had a major impact on the understanding of faith and truth over thousands of years.

Daniel's prophecy shows us that, in the end, divine truth will triumph, and "the little horn" will be defeated without human help, demonstrating that no human or philosophical force can stand against God's will.





The Scripture is fulfilled without contradictions



The prophecy of the "seventy weeks" in Daniel 9 is one of the most debated prophetic passages in the Bible. Despite numerous attempts to interpret it, many approaches get stuck in confusing calculations and forced conclusions. In the face of these difficulties, it is essential to find an interpretation that is not only coherent but also faithful to the text.


Where Do Most Interpretations Go Wrong?


The prophecy describes a period of "seventy weeks" (490 years), divided into three distinct sections: seven weeks, sixty-two weeks, and one final week (7+62+1). Although the starting point is clearly defined in the text as a decree for the restoration of Jerusalem, most interpretations wrongly choose the beginning or do not respect the order described in the text. The result? Chronological anomalies and events that do not match.


For example, some interpretations set the starting point in 444 B.C., the year of Nehemiah's decree, leading to 46 A.D., a date with no prophetic relevance. Those who use this starting point consider that the 69 weeks (7+62) mean 483 years. If we start from 444 B.C. and add 483 years, we arrive at 39 A.D. However, to adjust the calculation based on the Jewish calendar, which is based on 360-day years, these interpreters convert the 483 years into prophetic years. Since a prophetic year has only 360 days, they calculate 483 years x 360 days = 173,880 days. Dividing this number of days by 365.25 (to include leap years), the result is approximately 476 solar years. Thus, instead of 483 years, 476 solar years are used, and these 476 years added to 444 B.C. lead to 33 A.D., the supposed year of Jesus' crucifixion. The problem with this calculation is that it relies on an artificial adjustment of the calendar and does not naturally respect the chronological course of the biblical text.


Other interpretations, using the same calculations for the first 69 weeks, also arrive at 33 A.D. These interpretations start from the decree in 444 B.C. and use the same calculation of 69 weeks x 7 years = 483 years, which brings them to 33 A.D. after applying the adjustment for the Jewish calendar. The major difference lies in how they handle the last week. Unlike those who try to explain the entire prophecy in terms of a continuous 490-year interval, these theologians argue that there is a gap between the 69th and 70th weeks. They claim that this final week will take place in an undefined future, associated with the end times and events related to the Antichrist. However, this "gap" of thousands of years is not supported by the biblical text, which nowhere indicates such a break between the weeks.


It should now be clear that both interpretations make the same calculations for the first 69 weeks and apply the same corrections to arrive at 33 A.D., but handle the last week differently: some "solve" it through debatable adjustments, while others "throw" it into the future.


Another issue that arises is that the text in Daniel mentions that "in the middle of the week" the Anointed One will be "cut off," which suggests that the crucifixion would take place in the middle of the last week, not at the beginning of it. If we consider this detail, then the calculations show that, after the crucifixion, only three and a half years remain of the last week. This raises a serious question for those who interpret that the entire last week is in the future: how do they explain the fact that the crucifixion, which according to their calculations takes place at the beginning of the week, is described in the text as occurring in the middle of it? There is no clear or coherent explanation that solves this problem, leaving the interpretation incomplete and contradictory.


What Is the Correct Decree? The List and the Importance of Choosing


To correctly understand the prophecy, we must rigorously establish which decree meets the necessary conditions to mark the beginning of the seventy weeks. There are four decrees in Scripture, but only one fully corresponds to the text's requirements:

  • Cyrus' Decree (538 B.C.) – Allowed the Jews to return from captivity and rebuild the Temple. Although important, this decree does not include the rebuilding of the city and the restoration of the people, making it impossible to be the starting point.
  • Darius' Decree (520 B.C.) – Reaffirms Cyrus' decree and financially supports the construction of the Temple. Like the first decree, it does not involve the restoration of the city and Jewish life.
  • Artaxerxes' Decree to Ezra (457 B.C.) – Permits the complete restoration of Jerusalem and its institutions. Unlike the others, this decree also includes the reorganization of the Jewish legal and religious system, an essential aspect mentioned in Daniel 9.
  • Artaxerxes' Decree to Nehemiah (444 B.C.) – Authorizes only the rebuilding of the city's walls, without addressing the restoration of the social and religious system. Although it helps complete the works, it does not meet the necessary criteria to start the count.

Thus, only the decree from 457 B.C. fulfills all the conditions: the restoration of the city and the people, including religious and legal reorganization, exactly as the prophecy demands.


The Calculations That Confirm the Prophecy: What Happens After 457 B.C.?


Starting from 457 B.C., the period of the seventy weeks unfolds in three clear stages. The first seven weeks, equivalent to 49 years, cover the time needed to restore Jerusalem and its institutions in difficult times. Thus, we reach 408 B.C., when the city's reconstruction is complete.


The next sixty-two weeks (434 years) are added to 408 B.C., bringing us to 27 A.D. This is the moment when Jesus is baptized and recognized as the Messiah, confirming exactly the prophecy that the Anointed One would appear after the sixty-nine weeks (7+62). On the day of the baptism, a voice from heaven declares: "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased" (Matthew 3:17), confirming the public beginning of Jesus' mission and the moment of His anointing.


The Last Week: The New Covenant and the Fulfillment of Prophecy's Precision


The last week (7 years) is divided into two significant parts. It begins with Jesus' baptism in 27 A.D. and continues with His public activity, during which He makes a firm covenant with many, introducing the New Covenant through the preaching of the Kingdom of God and the call to repentance. Jesus' message, based on love, forgiveness, and restoration, draws people from different social categories and opens a new era in humanity's relationship with God.


In the middle of this week, in 31 A.D., Jesus is crucified. This moment fulfills the part of the prophecy that says, "in the middle of the week He will put an end to sacrifice and offering." Through His supreme sacrifice, Jesus ends the old system of sacrifices, opening the way for a new form of worship and relationship with God, based on faith and grace.


The second half of the week ends in 34 A.D., marking the moment when grace is extended beyond the limits of the Jewish people. This event is illustrated by the descent of the Holy Spirit in the house of Cornelius, a Roman centurion, where Peter and all those present witness a historic moment: "While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell on all who heard the word" (Acts 10:44). This public manifestation of the Holy Spirit to the Gentiles marks the end of the period of grace exclusively for Israel and the complete fulfillment of the seventy weeks.


Conclusion: Why Is This Interpretation the Only Coherent One?

This approach strictly adheres to the text and historical chronology, without artificial adjustments. From the decree in 457 B.C. to Jesus' baptism, His crucifixion, and the extension of grace to the Gentiles, every detail is fulfilled exactly as predicted. The prophecy of the seventy weeks not only reveals divine precision but also confirms that Scripture is fulfilled without contradictions. This interpretation is faithful and unaltered, demonstrating that God's plan is perfect in every detail, and historical events align precisely with what was prophesied, thus concluding a prophetic period of great significance.